A comment on our Academy Awards post below asked our opinion about the controversies regarding this year’s Sundance Film Festival, Robert Redford’s annual forum for what Hollywood types see as quirky and interesting films and what usually turns out to be a collection of rubbishy postmodern cliches. It’s a good question. First, some background, from a Chicago Tribune article on the festival: Child endangerment is nothing new to the movies; it’s just that audiences are more accustomed to shameless emotional peril and physical but non-sexual scenarios. But the kids are definitely not all right at this year’s Sundance Film Festival. Prior to its world premiere screening Monday, "Hounddog," starring 12-year-old Dakota Fanning as an incest and rape survivor in 1950s Bayou country, drew intense if uninformed criticism, mostly from pundits who hadn’t yet seen the film. . . . Objections to "Hounddog" have focused on the drama’s theme of dangerously sexualized pre-teens; a rape scene, in which Fanning’s Elvis-loving Lewellen (shown only from the shoulders up) is assaulted by the local milkman, and the question of whether Fanning should have been allowed to participate at all. "Hounddog" is one film among many in this year’s festival roster dealing with child

Recent Comments