By Mike Gray It’s not just that the writers, as thoughtful as they might otherwise be on all matters of faith and morals, do not know anything about economic theory. The problem is even more foundational: the widespread tendency is to deny the validity of the science itself. It is treated as some kind of pseudoscience invented to thwart the achievement of social justice or the realization of the perfectly moral utopia of faith. They therefore dismiss the entire discipline as forgettable and maybe even evil. It’s almost as if the entire subject is outside their field of intellectual vision. Here is a theory (with a debt to Rothbard, Hoppe, Kinsella, et al.) about why this situation persists. — Jeffrey A. Tucker Economics has been called the dismal science, principally by people who find the real world an intractable impediment to their utopian aspirations. They say spirituality and material concerns are mutually exclusive, but Tucker believes this notion needs to be rethought. Remember the feeding of the multitude and the parable of the pearl of great price in the New Testament? As an example , consider the case of the loaves and fishes, an incident in











Recent Comments