« A Culture of Narcissists | Main | Classic Film Alert: The Strawberry Blonde »

Grabbing the Green from the Greens

There's more than one sucker born every minute, and most of them born in the past few decades are decidedly green, or so the U.S. business community is increasingly coming to think. (And they should know.)

The odious Al Gore, who, having grown fat while prescribing even worse poverty for the developing nations and impoverishment of the developed ones, now distinctly resembles a parade float
As numerous companies increasingly market "green," supposedly environmentally friendly products, the U.S. business community is doing what free people always do: admirably adapt to changing conditions, however farcical the situation may be. The vast majority of scientists are convinced that (1) the world is warming naturally today, slightly, as part of a natural warming and cooling cycle that has existed since the atmosphere was formed; (2) that human activities contribute negligibly or not at all to this effect; and (3) the slight level of warming that we get in this go-round of the cycle will be entirely beneficial to human, animal, and plant life.

Despite these facts, countless influential politicians and other celebrities have decided that a scare over global warming is a great way to take more control over the economy and erode our minuscule freedoms even further. Businesses initially opposed the global warming movement, but many have backed off their support in the past year.

Clearly, they have realized that they simply cannot beat the Greens, with their political and media power, and have decided to join them.

It's a tragedy, and one that we will see as such in future decades, but for now it is the reality.

The latest manifestation of the power of this entirely irrational movement is yesterday's announcement that the Discovery TV channel operation will start a "Green channel." The New York Times reports:

Discovery Communications, the cable channel operator, plans to start a 24-hour channel focused on eco-friendly living, as part of a push into the rising environmental movement.

The company, based in Silver Spring, Md., will next year rebrand its Discovery Home Channel with a name that has not been selected but will reflect its position as the centerpiece of an initiative called PlanetGreen.

In addition to the cable channel, which will be carried initially in 50 million homes, other Discovery outlets including its flagship Discovery Channel will carry documentaries and other programming highlighting the new green lifestyle channel, said the chief executive, David M. Zaslav. . . .

PlanetGreen is one of the biggest efforts that a media company has made to tap into the growing movement that has spawned everything from green cars, food and architecture to green weddings and talk of a green Olympics. . . .

In addition to satisfying the interests of viewers, Mr. Zaslav said that advertisers now have distinct green budgets in the same way that they have online budgets.

Tragic. Stupid and tragic.

The best antidote to this nonsense, regarding the media, is still Michael Crichton's novel State of Fear. Purchase it here.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-tb.fcgi/319


Hosting by Yahoo!

Comments

Whenever I think about the Green/Al Gore movement, I always think about Anthem, Ayn Rand's first novel, I believe. I just noticed in my local paper that someone who has been "trained" by one of Al Gore's institutes will lecture about global warming at the Earth Day ceremonies at my local state college. I did glance at an article about him & he is a minister, not a scientist. It seems to me that he is nothing than a trained propagandist for Al Gore's views.

I wonder if Discovery or History Channel will start a "PlanetLiberty" channel...

Great idea--just don't hold your breath....

Dear Mr. Karnick:
Your comments on the Greens resonated with an article in today's (April 11th) paper:
"Climate changes in North America: Heat waves, storm surges, water shortages" screamed the headline posted from the United Nations by an anonymous AP reporter. ("AP, that bastion of the Truth," remarked my sarcastic wife.) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has brought down from the lofty heights its latest addenda to the Ten
Commandments: "Thou shalt not be prosperous if thou art a Western democracy" and "Thou shalt not raise any objections to anything we assert, even on the flimsiest evidence."
The article states that the executive director of the U.N. Environmental Program which co-founded the panel "said the findings underline that the best way to reduce the effects of global warming is 'deep and decisive cuts in greenhouse gas emissions to avoid dangerous climate change in the first place.'" Which is Newspeak for, "We're jealous of the American system, we hate it, and we're going to bring it down somehow."
So far all I've seen from the Greenies is scare-mongering buttressed by tons of Bad Science; it is doubtful that anyone can ever prove beyond doubt's shadow that what human beings do with their technology can cause the Earth either to warm up or cool down. Perhaps "global warming" is a natural change unrelated to arrogant man, who thinks he can somehow significantly alter a planet that masses out at nearly 6,600 billion billion billion tons, moves around the Sun at 67 thousand miles an hour, and undergoes periodic volcanic convulsions any one of which is more energetic than all the Cold War nuclear arsenals combined--and some of which change the climate in actually measurable ways.
Just as telling was the deliberate juxtaposition right over said article of a photo captioned: "Greek crews struggle to prevent environmental disaster", the photo being slightly larger than the global warming report. This is, I believe, a subtle use of a propaganda technique known as "transference": You're supposed to transfer your negative feelings about the "global warming" report to the sunken cruise ship and link the two together. In other words, a "twofer": one "man-made" disaster ("global warming") plus one REAL man-made disaster (a ship sinking) equals a hair-pulling, hand-wringing, despair-inducing "I'll do anything you say, just save me from this!" reaction--they hope.
One final thought: The Greenies, by personifying the Earth ("Gaia") and using imagery of a benign Planet Earth that "breathes" and "cries" out at our "rapacious" depredations, seems to be a recrudescence of ancient pagan nature religion of the kind that worships the creature rather than the Creator.
Respectfully,
Mike (not Linda)

Mike, your entire comment is spot-on. I concur fully. The human effect on global temperature, in my view, is virtually nil, and only a fool can fail to realize that the earth's temperature rises and falls naturally over time. When human production of "greenhouse gases" was at its highest--between WWII and the 1970s, the global temperature steadily fell, and since then, human production of ggs has fallen and the temperature has risen.

Plus, an increase in global temperatures on the level that we can expect to happen in coming years would be an unalloyed good for the planet: plants breathe carbon dioxide, and they thrive when there is more of it. That is a matter of science, as opposed to the heathen superstitions of the Greens.

Do you have a citation for these claims? These would be useful to us if we could substantiate them.

The vast majority of scientists are convinced that (1) the world is warming naturally today, slightly, as part of a natural warming and cooling cycle that has existed since the atmosphere was formed; (2) that human activities contribute negligibly or not at all to this effect; and (3) the slight level of warming that we get in this go-round of the cycle will be entirely beneficial to human, animal, and plant life.... When human production of "greenhouse gases" was at its highest--between WWII and the 1970s, the global temperature steadily fell, and since then, human production of ggs has fallen and the temperature has risen

Gladly. Try the following, just for starters. They're from a variety of sources both left and right but easily accessible using The Heartland Institute's PolicyBot, a database of articles and policy studies from all over. Of course, much more such information is available, but this should provide a good start for your investigation of the matter. Thanks for inquiring.

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20861

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20512

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20161

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20512

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20192

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6150

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=12392

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17784

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20803

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=11825

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20814

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17433

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9569

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17352

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20163

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20814

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20732

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20773

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=19213

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17568

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17407

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17181

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=15488&CFID=3418072&CFTOKEN=35440485

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=11308

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9607

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9855

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6599

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6689

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=5638

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=14281

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=14022

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9540

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9533

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9559

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9560

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9610

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9586

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9611

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9616

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9633

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9644

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9664

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9693

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9713

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9714

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9744

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9778

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9801

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9802

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9831

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9830

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9881

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9880

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6702

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6685

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6688

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6727

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6686

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6602

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6139

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=6622

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20516

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20336

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17571

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17434

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=13109

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=8959

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=7510

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9724

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20645

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=11548&CFID=3418072&CFTOKEN=35440485

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20641

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9806

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=9887

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=19215

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=12284

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=2559

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20505

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20506

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20518

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=2551

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=12284

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)