<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The American Culture</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://stkarnick.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2010://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="The American Culture" />
    <updated>2009-12-11T22:32:05Z</updated>
    <subtitle><![CDATA[Movies, books, TV, music, games, manners, and more&#8212news, reviews, and analysis, edited by S.&nbsp;T.&nbsp;Karnick]]></subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2ysb5-20051201</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Author, Libby Malin Sternberg on writing for romance and YA fiction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/author_libby_malin_sternberg_o.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1453" title="Author, Libby Malin Sternberg on writing for romance and YA fiction" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1453</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-11T22:06:21Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-11T22:32:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[The most recent issue of The Culture Alliance&rsquo;s Weekly Update newsletter included a focus on Cultural Influence Professional Libby Malin Sternberg, novelist of romance and Young Adult fiction. She provides advice to aspiring writers, discusses the challenge of writing romance...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel Crandall</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Prose fiction" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong><img width="223" vspace="10" hspace="10" height="340" border="0" align="left" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4041/4176874745_691dc8b9f8_o.jpg" />The most recent issue of The Culture Alliance&rsquo;s Weekly Update newsletter included a focus on Cultural Influence Professional Libby Malin Sternberg, novelist of romance and Young Adult fiction. She provides advice to aspiring writers, discusses the challenge of writing romance novels, and reviews the possibilities existing within so-called Young Adult fiction.<br /></strong>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Libby Malin Sternberg is a novelist, the author of six books. She has been published by Harlequin, Dorchester, Bancroft Press, and Sourcebooks. She writes young adult fiction as Libby Sternberg and humorous women&rsquo;s fiction as Libby Malin. Her first YA mystery, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1890862282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1890862282" target="_blank">Uncovering Sadie&rsquo;s Secrets</a></em>, was an Edgar nominee. Her 2009 humorous women&rsquo;s fiction, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1402217579?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1402217579" target="_blank">Fire Me</a></em>, about a woman trying to get the pink slip, has been optioned for film. In April 2010, Sourcebooks will publish <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1402229429?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1402229429" target="_blank"><em>My Own Personal Soap Opera</em></a>, about the head writer of a failing daytime drama who blends fantasy with real life in her stories. In September of that year, Five Star will publish her Jane Eyre-inspired tale of old Hollywood, Sloane Hall.<br /><br />Here are her thoughts for aspiring novelists, the challenge of writing romance novels, and the range of possibilities for those willing to produce so-called Young Adult fiction.</p></blockquote><p>If you had told me, as I began seriously devoting time to writing fiction, that I would eventually be published in humorous women&rsquo;s fiction and young adult, I would have said you were crazy. My dream of becoming a published author had included &ldquo;lit-rah-chure&rdquo; in the label. Romance, juvenile fiction&mdash;<em>phhtt, not for me</em>.<br /><br />But here I am ten years later with six published books to my name and not a literary fiction title among them. I&rsquo;m not a famous or bestselling novelist by any means. But I am a working one.<br /><br />This journey has taught me an important lesson that aspiring authors would be wise to embrace&mdash;learn what your strengths are, learn about the publishing markets, and use your strengths to fit into the market. So while I might still dream of publishing a title that is both commercial and literary, I&rsquo;ll use the talent that does sell my stories to the best of my ability.<br /><br />In fact, other advice I&rsquo;d give to aspiring novelists is not to eschew genre fiction if your strengths lie in those fields&mdash;mystery, thriller, sci-fi, fantasy, even romance. Genre fiction can sometimes cross over into literary fiction. Jane Eyre, after all, is a classic romance.<br /><br />I decided to try writing romance because I was under the false impression that getting published in that genre would be easy. How hard could it be for a decent writer to come up with the formulaic story of girl-meets-boy, they squabble, have a &ldquo;dark moment&rdquo; when all seems lost, and then eventually come to the HEA (&ldquo;happily ever after,&rdquo; in romance parlance)?<br /><br />As it turns out, it&rsquo;s actually very difficult. When the reader knows the game plan on the opening page, making her care about the characters and keeping her surprised by the plot is a tremendous challenge. I now think that beginning writers would learn a great deal about their writing &ldquo;chops&rdquo; if they first tried their hand at romance.<br /><br />I also write teen fiction, called Young Adult in the book trade, another genre that might seem &ldquo;easy&rdquo; to write on its surface, but presents a whole different set of challenges, including choosing appropriate vocabulary and creating relatable characters.<br /><br />To me, the YA label is something of a misnomer, though. Most teens I know read adult fiction, whereas the pre-teen or &ldquo;tweener&rdquo; crowd (9 to 13-year-olds) is more likely to pick up YA.<br /><br />Because of my understanding of who reads YA, I tend to keep my YAs very clean&mdash;no sex, no swearing, no drugs or alcohol. My goal is to entertain my readers, possibly making them feel better about themselves along the way. Even my one historical YA, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1890862517?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1890862517" target="_blank"><em>The Case Against My Brother</em></a>, is a mystery first, a lesson in prejudice second.<br /><br />Many YA books cover a wide range of topics, introducing teen readers to questions about sexuality, abuse, drugs, drinking and more. General interest publications would provide a great service to parents if they devoted more attention to YA, offering reviews and round-ups of YA fiction. Currently, YA is reviewed most extensively in publications read by librarians and youth advocates&mdash;not by the general public.<br /><br />For those willing to take a closer look, YA fiction is a deep field with many wonderful historical and contemporary tales&mdash;everything from little known history (D. Dina Friedman&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1416986480?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1416986480" target="_blank"><em>Escaping into the Night</em></a> comes to mind&mdash;the story of a Jewish girl who survives the Holocaust by joining encampments in the forest) to contemporary tales with important lessons (Sara Griffiths&rsquo; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1890862487?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1890862487" target="_blank"><em>Thrown a Curve</em></a>, about a young girl who pitches for a boys&rsquo; softball team). Or even mysteries featuring a regular gal who goes to a parochial school (my Bianca Balducci series &ndash; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1890862282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1890862282" target="_blank"><em>Uncovering Sadie&rsquo;s Secrets</em></a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0843955031?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0843955031" target="_blank"><em>Finding the Forger</em></a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1890862584?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=1890862584"><em>Recovering Dad</em></a> &ndash; published by <a href="http://www.bancroftpress.com/" target="_blank">Bancroft Press</a>).<br /><br />Whether a writer chooses genre, YA or literary fiction as a goal, the same rules apply&mdash;learn your craft, learn your strengths, and learn the markets.<br /><br />Libby Malin Sternberg is happy to answer questions from aspiring authors. Write her at <a href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/Libby_Sternberg@hotmail.com " target="_blank">Libby_Sternberg@hotmail.com </a>. Visit her website at <a href="http://www.libbysternberg.com/" target="_blank">www.LibbysBooks.com</a>. Connect to her at <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Libby-Malin-Sternberg/1152091800" target="_blank">Facebook</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>TCM Thrillers Preview (December 14 - 20)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/tcm_thrillers_preview_december_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1452" title="TCM Thrillers Preview (December 14 - 20)" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1452</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-10T15:19:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-10T16:25:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Gray</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Movies" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img width="250" height="311" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/Man_in_the_attic.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p align="center">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="440" height="700" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6b/Bluedahlia.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6e/Death_on_the_nile.jpeg" /><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="502" height="755" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6e/Death_on_the_nile.jpeg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="288" height="216" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f8/8_ustinov.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/517B8IDu5RL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="345" height="533" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c2/The_Trouble_with_Harry.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p><img width="513" height="343" title="Monday" alt="Monday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/The_Trouble_With_Harry_title_from_trailer.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="381" height="460" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8d/Scarletpimpernelfilm1934.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51vWzWCNyVL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="333" height="447" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/16/Rebecca_1940_film_poster.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="392" height="401" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/RebeccaTrailer.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="400" height="545" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/ReturnofDoctorX.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="337" height="442" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/07/Brother_Orchid.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51vCZ4Ib4hL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="386" height="650" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c0/Wagons_Roll_at_Night.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="446" height="360" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/ce/AcrossthePacific.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="389" height="337" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/AcrossthePacificshot.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="350" height="465" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/99/Falconm.JPG" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="518" height="390" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ec/Maltese_Falconcast.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51GKQYW7SFL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="344" height="460" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/45/Casablanca_original_film_poster.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="337" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Casablanca%2C_Trailer_Screenshot.JPG" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="354" height="252" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/Humphrey_Bogart_and_Sydney_Greenstreet_in_Casablanca_crop_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="530" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/Casablanca%2C_title.JPG" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="390" height="550" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/12/Treasuremadre.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="365" height="500" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/2e/5f/3894eb6709a046e4afbe0110.L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="474" height="349" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/5a/b6/8f49b220dca0dc33f3277010.L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="441" height="574" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f6/Magnificent_original.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="405" height="294" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bc/Sturges3.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="398" height="699" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a0/Shaneposter.png" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="478" height="466" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/Jean_Arthur_in_Shane.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="425" height="550" title="Saturday" alt="Saturday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a6/Outofthepast.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="426" height="270" title="Saturday" alt="Saturday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1f/Out_of_the_past_1.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="386" height="526" title="Saturday" alt="Saturday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/39/Scaramouche_1952_film.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Liberals Wonder: Is &apos;30 Rock&apos; racist?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/liberals_wonder_is_30_rock_rac.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1451" title="Liberals Wonder: Is '30 Rock' racist?" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1451</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-10T03:53:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-10T06:16:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;It's gotta be, right? Just look at all that bling on Tracey Jordan....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Lakely</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Television" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="470" height="375" border="0" src="http://tvquotes.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/30rock.jpg" alt="30 Rock" title="30 Rock" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><h3 style="text-align: center"><span style="font-weight: bold">It's gotta be, right? Just look at all that bling on Tracey Jordan. </span><br /></h3>]]>
        <![CDATA[<span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span"><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">Almost as fun as watching <a href="http://www.nbc.com/30-rock/" target="_blank"><em>30 Rock</em></a> is watching liberals laugh and then think (<a href="http://citypaper.net/blogs/clog/2009/12/09/anybody-else-feel-like-tvs-getting-kind-of-racist/" target="_blank">out loud on their blogs</a>): &quot;Does laughing at the antics of Tracy Morgan make me racist? This might be, at best, a guilty pleasure, and perhaps I shouldn't be enjoying it. Because, well,<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>real racists</em><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>might enjoy these jokes, too.&quot;</p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">That's not a direct quote of <a target="_blank" href="http://citypaper.net/blogs/clog/2009/12/09/anybody-else-feel-like-tvs-getting-kind-of-racist/">Philly-based blogger Isaiah Thompson</a>, but close enough. He raises the question of whether we really should be laughing at the jokes and story lines of two of America's most celebrated and successful television comedies: <span style="font-style: italic">30 Rock</span> and <a href="http://www.hbo.com/larrydavid/" target="_blank"><span style="font-style: italic">Curb Your Enthusiasm</span></a>. Thompson writes:</p></span></span><div style="margin-left: 40px"><span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span"><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">Anybody else feel like TV's been getting uncomfortably, overtly racist?</p></span></span></div><span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span"><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">See? I said I was close enough. To be fair, Thompson backs off from that question later in <a href="http://citypaper.net/blogs/clog/2009/12/09/anybody-else-feel-like-tvs-getting-kind-of-racist/" target="_blank">his brief blog post</a>:</p></span></span><blockquote><span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span"><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">But I don't really buy it. And yeah, I'm the [expletive] who's ruining the joke by talking about it: but of the many things that make <span style="font-style: italic">Curb</span> and <span style="font-style: italic">30 Rock</span> hilarious, I gotta say: black people playing crazy black people doesn't top my list.</p></span></span></blockquote><span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span"><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">So ... Thompson apparently feels so much guilt about the prospect of laughing at &quot;black people playing crazy black people,&quot; he's moved the Tracy Jordan character off the list of reasons <em>30 Rock</em> is &quot;hilarious.&quot; <span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span">Me? I start laughing just<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>looking</em><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>at the great character<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracy_Jordan">Tracy Morgan created</a><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>for<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>30 Rock</em>. I start cracking up during the opening credits.<br /></span></span></p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">Another liberal Philly-based blogger, my friend <a href="http://politics.pwblogs.com/" target="_blank">Joel Mathis</a>, is a bit more sanguine on this question than Thompson. In fact, Mathis <span class="Apple-converted-space"><span class="Apple-converted-space"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/politics/2009/12/09/is-30-rock-racist/">pretty much nails it</a>:</span></span></p><blockquote><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">To the extent that <em>30 Rock</em> has an attitude toward race &mdash; and isn&rsquo;t simply finding jokes where it can &mdash; it&rsquo;s a wry commentary, I think, on &ldquo;post-racial&rdquo; America, a country filled with people, like Liz Lemon, whose good intentions are sometimes at war with their darker impulses and the whole thing can simply be very, very uncomfortable. It&rsquo;s tricky ground to mine for laughs; I think 30 Rock does a pretty good job of it.</p></blockquote><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">I'd replace &quot;darker impulses&quot; with &quot;human impulses,&quot; but Mathis' take is sound. If we truly are in a &quot;post-racial America,&quot; it should be OK to laugh, right? <em>30 Rock</em> is only treading on &quot;tricky ground&quot; because of the political correct culture that has consumed Hollywood for at least 30 years. The great irony is that two classic, incredibly funny sitcoms &mdash;<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>All in the Family</em><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>and<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>The Jeffersons</em><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>&mdash; were created by arguably the most influential liberal in televised Hollywood, <a href="http://www.normanlear.com/" target="_blank">Norman Lear</a>. And, yeah. My racist father (certainly racist by today's standards) and racists across the country in the '70s laughed it up at Archie's antics.</p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">Perhaps that's why for so long race has been so off limits for TV laughs. Writers were afraid to &quot;comfort&quot; those who didn't laugh <strong><span style="font-style: italic">at</span></strong> Archie, but laughed <strong><span style="font-style: italic">with</span></strong> him &mdash; at least a little too much for comfort. Despite the brilliant comedy to be found of <span style="font-style: italic">All in the Family</span> &mdash; not to mention the liberal social commentary Lear applied with a <span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(73, 73, 73); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 20px" class="Apple-style-span">sledgehammer </span></span>&mdash; it just wasn't worth it if some people laughed for the wrong reasons.<br /></p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">I find it incredibly refreshing the way<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>30 Rock</em><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>and<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>The Office</em><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>are not afraid to not just dip their toes into the racial joke pool, but at times do a cannonball in the deep end. The<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity_Day">&quot;Diversity Day&quot;</a><span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>episode of<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><em>The Office</em>, the second episode of the first season, is a genuine classic. I think I've seen it at least a dozen times, and it still makes me laugh my head off. I remember the first time I saw it. I turned to my wife and said: &quot;I can't believe they had the courage to do that. It's taboo. I hope they don't get in trouble.&quot;</p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">That episode of <em>The Office</em> really was ground-breaking (or re-ground-breaking), and it's a credit to the creative team behind the show that they've regularly attempted to find humor by bursting the bubble of racial political correctness. The target of parody on <span style="font-style: italic">The Office</span> in such episodes is not just <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scott_%28The_Office%29" target="_blank">Michael Scott's</a> unenlightened racial views, but the decades of PC racial &quot;enlightenment&quot; that has been inflicted on America. We are currently enjoying &mdash;&nbsp;or at least I am &mdash;&nbsp;an era in television comedy where writers trust and respect their audience to laugh at racism without fear of perpetuating racism. Such a mindset was always an insult to the intelligence of the audience. Good riddance.<br /></p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">Kevetching about whether the Tracy Jordan character's stupidity somehow perpetuates &quot;racial stereotypes&quot; is for the birds. But I'd take this line of argument more seriously if there was a smidgen of concern about the negative stereotypes of Southern folk inherent in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Parcell" target="_blank">Kenneth Parcell</a> character on <span style="font-style: italic">30 Rock</span>. But, again, kevetching about <span style="font-style: italic">that</span> is also for the birds. I think the stereotype-driven jokes about Kenneth are hilarious, too.</p><p style="margin: 0.6em 0px 1.2em; padding: 0px">Good television comedy writing is about focusing &mdash; without fear &mdash; on what's funny. Period. The fact that some liberal commentators are still weighing political correctness and enforced &quot;sensitivity&quot; versus getting a laugh is proof that some of us are not yet embracing the new &quot;post-racial America.&quot; At least not yet. <br /></p></span></span>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The Totalitarian Mindset and Global Warming</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/the_totalitarian_mindset_and_g.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1450" title="The Totalitarian Mindset and Global Warming" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1450</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-09T00:49:28Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-09T01:14:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[Bret Stephens in the Wall Street Journal argues that &ldquo;climate change&rdquo; enthusiasts are driven by a &ldquo;totalitarian impulse.&rdquo;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike D&apos;Virgilio</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img width="350" height="220" align="right" src="http://www.laist.com/attachments/laist_dara/stalin.jpg" border="0" vspace="10" hspace="10" /><strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703558004574581673107794380.html" target="_blank">Bret Stephens in the Wall Street Journal</a> argues that &ldquo;climate change&rdquo; enthusiasts are driven by a &ldquo;totalitarian impulse.&rdquo;</strong></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>It is apparent to many, especially after &ldquo;climategate,&rdquo; that the psychology of those who believe that man-made global warming is soon to destroy us all is about more than scientific evidence. Stephens outline seven areas that capture the mindset of the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html" target="_blank">Copenhagen cabal</a>. To those who remember the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth" target="_blank">Club of</a> Rome and the warnings in the 1970s that we were at the dawn of a new ice age and that millions would starve because the planet couldn&rsquo;t sustain an exploding population, this is nothing new. <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.02/ffsimon_pr.html" target="_blank">Julian Simon</a> put the lie to the doomsayers back then, but predictions that never come true don&rsquo;t matter to the true believers. </p><p>This is as obvious and predictable as everything else the left does. Here are a couple of points Stephens makes and you can read the rest in the article:</p><blockquote><p>&bull; <em>Utopianism:</em> In the world as it is, climate alarmists see humanity hurtling toward certain doom. In the world as it might be, humanity has seen the light and changed its patterns of behavior, becoming the green equivalent of the Soviet &quot;new man.&quot; At his disposal are technologies that defy the laws of thermodynamics. The problems now attributed to global warming abate or disappear.</p><p><em>&bull; Anti-humanism:</em> In his 2007 best seller &quot;The World Without Us,&quot; environmentalist Alan Weisman considers what the planet would be like without mankind, and finds it's no bad thing. The U.N. Population Fund complains in a recent report that &quot;no human is genuinely 'carbon neutral'&quot;&mdash;its latest argument against children. John Holdren, President Obama's science adviser, cut his teeth in the policy world as an overpopulation obsessive worried about global cooling. But whether warming or cooling, the problem for the climate alarmists, as for other totalitarians, always seems to boil down to the human race itself.</p><p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Of Marigolds and Minarets</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/of_marigolds_and_minarets.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1449" title="Of Marigolds and Minarets" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1449</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-08T21:23:44Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-08T21:43:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Gray</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Web" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="248" title="Life forms&mdash;or something else?" alt="Life forms&mdash;or something else?" src="http://static.icr.org/i/articles/af/life_leaves_wide.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Starting with the towers</strong></p><p><em>Does architecture have cultural significance? You bet:</em></p><p><strong>... people in Switzerland, across Europe and notably in France &ndash; where stagnating birthrates and a breathtaking influx of Muslim immigrants are swamping these nations with a newly powerful Islamic presence &ndash; are terrified. They're terrified because suddenly their countries are awash in adherents to a religion that glorifies death, subjugates women and threatens with violence anyone who dares to oppose it. Like the fictional towers of the snake cult of Set in <em>Conan</em>, the minarets of Islam are rising over the formerly free people of these Western cultures, and these individuals are aghast and afraid of what awaits them.</strong></p><p><em>The entire article is <a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=117746" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Can a plant die?</strong></p><p><em>But how can something die that was never alive?</em></p><p><strong>Evolutionary thought ties the function of life all the way from single-cell organisms to humanity. Paramecium, plants, pollywogs, primates, and people are merely increasingly more complex assemblages of cells that have &quot;developed&quot; over deep time. In practice, plants are considered to be just as alive as are people. The life sciences include botany as well as biology .... However, there is a popular teaching among evangelicals that physical death was part of God's original &quot;good&quot; creation. This dangerous doctrine is partially based on the &quot;scientific fact&quot; that plants are living things, and since God commanded humans to use these living plants as food, they &quot;kill&quot; plants when they eat them.</strong></p><p><em>Vegans, at least, can heave a collective sigh of relief now.</em></p><p><em>Read the entire article <a href="http://www.icr.org/article/5068/" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p><p>~~~~~~~~~~~</p><p>&mdash;<strong><em>Mike Gray</em></strong></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The Twilight series: Mormon apologetics with vampires &amp; werewolves</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/the_twilight_series_is_much_mo.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1448" title="The Twilight series: Mormon apologetics with vampires &amp; werewolves" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1448</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-06T14:36:22Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-06T15:21:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[John Granger examines the &quot;the distinctively Latter-day Saint theological-literary structure&quot; within Stephanie Meyer's popular books. His arguments deserve serious consideration by both fans and detractors of this pop culture phenomena, notes Daniel Crandall....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel Crandall</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Prose fiction" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<img width="250" vspace="10" hspace="10" height="375" border="0" align="left" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2531/4163212548_92418a1e37.jpg" /><strong>John Granger examines the &quot;the distinctively Latter-day Saint theological-literary structure&quot; within Stephanie Meyer's popular books. His arguments deserve serious consideration by both fans and detractors of this pop culture phenomena, notes Daniel Crandall.</strong>]]>
        <![CDATA[John Granger has written extensively on the Harry Potter films. His website on that subject is the &ldquo;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.hogwartsprofessor.com/">Hogwarts Professor</a>&rdquo; and he has been dubbed by Time magazine as the &ldquo;Dean of Harry Potter Scholars.&rdquo; Now he brings his critical eye to Stephanie Meyer&rsquo;s <em>Twilight </em>series of books and provides readers with some fascinating insight into what Ms. Meyer may be doing with her books about vampires, werewolves and teenage romance. Granger&rsquo;s Touchstone article, titled &ldquo;<a href="http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-08-024-f" target="_blank">Mormon Vampires in the Garden of Eden</a>,&rdquo; is almost enough to make me want to sit down with Meyer&rsquo;s books.&nbsp; <br /><br /><blockquote>I suggest that the <em>Twilight </em>series is something for thoughtful people to be aware of and to think seriously about, first, because of its remarkable hold on the imagination of American readers and movie-goers, but second, and more important, because of the reason these books are so popular: They meet a spiritual need. Mircea Eliade, in his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/015679201X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=015679201X" target="_blank"><em>The Sacred and the Profane</em></a>, suggests that popular entertainment, especially imaginative literature and film, serves a religious or mythic function in a secular culture. When God is driven to the periphery of the public square, the human spiritual capacity longs for exercise, and it often finds it in the &ldquo;suspension of disbelief&rdquo; and activity of the imagination that are available in novels and movies. &hellip;<br /><br />These Gothic romances featuring atypical vampires and werewolf champions are allegories about the love relationship between God and Man. They are, in fact, a re-telling of the Garden of Eden drama&mdash;with a Mormon twist. Here, the Fall is a good thing, even the key to salvation and divinization, just as Joseph Smith, Jr., the Latter-day Saint prophet, said it was. Twilight conveys the appealing message that the surest means to God are sex and marriage.<br /></blockquote>According to Granger, Meyer not only gives a Mormon apologetic in the guise of a fantastical teen romance, she &quot;also incorporates substantial criticism of her church in her story.&quot;<br /><br />The depth of Granger&rsquo;s understanding of Mormon history and belief is profound and his arguments concerning what many believe is nothing but a bit pop culture ephemera deserve serious consideration. Read all of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=22-08-024-f">John Granger&rsquo;s article at the Touchstone website</a>. This, along with <a target="_blank" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/11/twilight_new_moon_selling_ones.html#comment-165215">some of the comments</a> my initial <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/11/twilight_new_moon_selling_ones.html" target="_blank">review of the latest Twilight film</a>, are enough to make me think a second time about my position concerning Twilight's themes.]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>TCM Thrillers (December 7 - 13)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/tcm_thrillers_december_7_13.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1447" title="TCM Thrillers (December 7 - 13)" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1447</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-05T16:12:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-05T16:44:04Z</updated>
    
    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Gray</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Movies" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img width="200" height="336" title="'D.O.A.' (1950)" alt="'D.O.A.' (1950)" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/DOA1950.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week:<br />* <em>Tuesday</em>&mdash;Lee Marvin makes coffee nervous.<br />*<em> Wednesday and Thursday</em>&mdash;More Warner Bros. crime dramas from the thirties and forties, nine in all.<br />* <em>Friday</em>&mdash;Robert Taylor finds Ava Gardner quite a distraction; Edmond O'Brien murders ... himself; and William Talman doesn't get any tougher.</p><p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p><p><strong>Monday&mdash;December 7th</strong></p><p><em>Mostly seldom-seen war films until sunset.</em></p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Tuesday&mdash;December 8th</strong></p><p>2:15 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0790743949?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0790743949" target="_blank">Arsenic and Old Lace</a></em></strong> (1944)<br />A young man about to be married discovers the two aunts who raised him have been poisoning lonely old men.<br />Cast: Cary Grant, Raymond Massey, Peter Lorre. Dir: Frank Capra. BW-118 mins, TV-G, CC, DVS</p><p>7:30 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005RDRL?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B00005RDRL" target="_blank">The Big Heat</a></em></strong> (1953)<br />A police detective whose wife was killed by the mob teams with a scarred gangster's moll to bring down a powerful gangster.<br />Cast: Glenn Ford, Gloria Grahame, Lee Marvin. Dir: Fritz Lang. BW-90 mins, TV-14, CC</p><p>1:00 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002IKLZZY?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B002IKLZZY" target="_blank">North by Northwest</a></em></strong> (1959)<br />An advertising man is mistaken for a spy, triggering a deadly cross-country chase.<br />Cast: Cary Grant, Eva Marie Saint, James Mason. Dir: Alfred Hitchcock. C-136 mins, TV-PG, CC, Letterbox Format, DVS</p><p>5:45 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000CCW2UW?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B000CCW2UW" target="_blank">Family Plot</a></em></strong> (1976)<br />A phony psychic takes on a pair of kidnappers.<br />Cast: Barbara Harris, Bruce Dern, Karen Black. Dir: Alfred Hitchcock. C-120 mins, TV-14, Letterbox Format</p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Wednesday&mdash;December 9th</strong></p><p>12:00 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000NOK0GM?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B000NOK0GM" target="_blank">The Third Man</a></em></strong> (1949)<br />A man's investigation of a friend's death uncovers corruption in post-World War II Vienna.<br />Cast: Joseph Cotten, Orson Welles, Alida Valli. Dir: Carol Reed. BW-104 mins, TV-14, CC</p><p>2:00 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000OHBCI8?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B000OHBCI8" target="_blank">The Picture of Dorian Gray</a></em></strong> (1945)<br />A man remains young and handsome while his portrait shows the ravages of age and sin.<br />Cast: Hurd Hatfield, Angela Lansbury, Donna Reed. Dir: Albert Lewin. BW-110 mins, TV-G, CC</p><p>4:00 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000W4876S?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B000W4876S" target="_blank">Dead of Night</a></em></strong> (1945)<br />Guests at a country estate share stories of the supernatural.<br />Cast: Mervyn Johns, Roland Culver, Michael Redgrave. Dir: Alberto Cavalcanti, Charles Crichton, Basil Dearden, Robert Hamer. BW-103 mins, TV-14, CC</p><p>6:00 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FI9OC2?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B000FI9OC2" target="_blank">San Quentin</a></em></strong> (1937)<br />A convict's sister falls for the captain of the prison guards.<br />Cast: Pat O'Brien, Humphrey Bogart, Ann Sheridan. Dir: Lloyd Bacon. BW-70 mins, TV-PG, CC</p><p>7:15 AM&mdash;<strong><em>The Amazing Doctor Clitterhouse</em></strong> (1938)<br />A doctor plots crimes so he can study criminal psychology.<br />Cast: Edward G. Robinson, Claire Trevor, Humphrey Bogart. Dir: Anatole Litvak. BW-87 mins, TV-PG, CC</p><p>8:45 AM&mdash;<strong><em>Crime School</em></strong> (1938)<br />A crusading warden sets out to improve conditions at a reform school.<br />Cast: The Dead End Kids, Humphrey Bogart, Gale Page. Dir: Lewis Seiler. BW-85 mins, TV-G, CC</p><p>11:30 AM&mdash;<strong><em>Racket Busters</em></strong> (1938)<br />A mobster tries to take over the trucking business.<br />Cast: George Brent, Humphrey Bogart, Allen Jenkins. Dir: Lloyd Bacon. BW-71 mins, TV-G, CC</p><p>4:15 PM&mdash;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001IYPSSQ?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B001IYPSSQ" target="_blank"><strong><em>Invisible Stripes</em></strong> </a>(1939)<br />On his release from prison, a crook tries to stop his brother from following in his footsteps.<br />Cast: George Raft, William Holden, Humphrey Bogart. Dir: Lloyd Bacon. BW-81 mins, TV-G, CC</p><p>5:45 PM&mdash;<strong><em>King of the Underworld</em></strong> (1939)<br />A lady doctor gets mixed up with a criminal gang.<br />Cast: Humphrey Bogart, Kay Francis, James Stephenson. Dir: Lewis Seiler. BW-67 mins, TV-PG, CC</p><p>9:30 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0006HBV32?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B0006HBV32" target="_blank">The Roaring Twenties</a></em></strong> (1939)<br />Three World War I Army buddies get mixed up with the mob in peacetime.<br />Cast: James Cagney, Priscilla Lane, Humphrey Bogart. Dir: Raoul Walsh. BW-107 mins, TV-G, CC</p><p>11:30 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000B1OGF?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B0000B1OGF" target="_blank">They Drive by Night</a></em></strong> (1940)<br />Truck driving brothers are framed for murder by a lady psycho.<br />Cast: George Raft, Ann Sheridan, Humphrey Bogart. Dir: Raoul Walsh. BW-95 mins, TV-PG, CC</p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Thursday&mdash;December 10th</strong></p><p>1:30 AM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000GIXLV6?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B000GIXLV6" target="_blank">High Sierra</a></em></strong> (1941)<br />An aging ex-con sets out to pull one more big heist.<br />Cast: Humphrey Bogart, Ida Lupino, Arthur Kennedy. Dir: Raoul Walsh. BW-100 mins, TV-G, CC</p><p>10:00 PM&mdash;<strong><em>Fitzwilly</em></strong> (1967)<br />When an aging philanthropist goes broke, her butler robs from the rich so she can give to the poor.<br />Cast: Dick Van Dyke, Edith Evans, Barbara Feldon. Dir: Delbert Mann. C-102 mins, TV-PG, Letterbox Format</p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Friday&mdash;December 11th</strong></p><p>2:00 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002S56R7K?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B002S56R7K" target="_blank">The Bribe</a></em></strong> (1949)<br />A sultry singer tries to tempt a federal agent from the straight-and-narrow.<br />Cast: Robert Taylor, Ava Gardner, Charles Laughton. Dir: Robert Z. Leonard. BW-98 mins, TV-PG, CC</p><p>3:45 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0009RS0CY?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B0009RS0CY" target="_blank">The Bigamist</a></em></strong> (1953)<br />A woman discovers her husband has another family in another city.<br />Cast: Joan Fontaine, Ida Lupino, Edmond O'Brien. Dir: Ida Lupino. BW-79 mins, TV-PG</p><p>5:15 PM&mdash;<strong><em>D.O.A.</em></strong> (1950)<br />The victim of a slow-acting poison tracks down his own killer.<br />Cast: Edmond O'Brien, Pamela Britton, Luther Adler. Dir: Rudolph Mate. BW-84 mins, TV-14</p><p>6:45 PM&mdash;<strong><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001IMJWYO?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=B001IMJWYO" target="_blank">The Hitch-Hiker</a></em></strong> (1953)<br />A dangerous madman kidnaps two businessmen on a hunting trip.<br />Cast: Edmond O'Brien, Frank Lovejoy, William Talman. Dir: Ida Lupino. BW-71 mins, TV-PG</p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Saturday&mdash;December 12th</strong></p><p>10:30 AM&mdash;<strong><em>Alias Boston Blackie</em></strong> (1942)<br />A reformed thief tracks down an escaped convict so he can prove the man is innocent.<br />Cast: Chester Morris, Adele Mara, Richard Lane. Dir: Lew Landers. BW-67 mins, TV-PG</p><p>----------</p><p><strong>Sunday&mdash;December 13th</strong></p><p>~~~~~~~~~~~</p><p>&mdash;<strong><em>Mike Gray</em></strong></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Winsome &apos;White Collar&apos; Offers Solid Entertainment, Good Values</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/post_311.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1446" title="Winsome 'White Collar' Offers Solid Entertainment, Good Values" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1446</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-04T18:50:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-04T21:52:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>White Collar, formula, series, TV, drama, mystery, comedy, USA Network</summary>
    <author>
        <name>S. T. Karnick</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div align="center"><strong><img width="385" hspace="10" height="300" border="0" align="right" src="http://static.tvguide.com/MediaBin/Galleries/Shows/S_Z/Wa_Wh/White_Collar/season1/white-collar17.jpg" alt="(l-r) Tim DeKay, Matt Bomer, and Tiffani Thiessen in 'White Collar'" title="(l-r) Tim DeKay, Matt Bomer, and Tiffani Thiessen in 'White Collar'" /></strong></div><div align="center">&nbsp;</div><div align="center">&nbsp;</div><div align="center">&nbsp;</div><div align="center">&nbsp;</div><div align="center">&nbsp;</div><div align="center">&nbsp;</div><div align="center"><strong>The USA Network comedy-drama series <em>White Collar</em> exemplifies what television dramas do best, S. T. Karnick writes.</strong><br /></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[In the classic manner of series television, the USA Network's latest new comedy-drama series, <em>White Collar </em>(Fridays at 10 EST), smartly combines elements common to numerous other contemporary TV crime dramas, <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/monk_finale_tonight.html" target="_blank">especially other USA Network shows</a>, in a way calculated to maximize both familiarity and originality. Thus we have at the center of the show a pair of characters of strongly contrasting personalities but similar values under the surface differences, working together to do good.<p>Convicted confidence artist, forger, and counterfeiter Neal Caffrey (Matt Bomer) is released from prison (and shackled with an electronic tracking device) in order to assist FBI agent Peter Burke (Tim DeKay) in catching other criminals. As in the 1960s TV series <em><a href="http://www.hulu.com/it-takes-a-thief" target="_blank">It Takes a Thief</a>,</em> Caffrey is young, handsome, single, insouciant, creative, and free-spirited, and his FBI handler is more mature, less handsome, and more conventional and stable.</p><p>Together, as in all such shows and in real life to a surprising degree, their differing capacities complement each other and make for a highly effective team. The pair work well together in solving the mysteries that face them each week in the board rooms, boudoirs, and mean streets of New York City, and as noted earlier, they do seem to share many of the same values, especially now that Caffrey finds himself confronted by unexpectedly dire consequences of his raffish prior existence, which I'll discuss later in this article.</p><p>The use of confidence schemes as a central plot element is of course a common theme in contemporary television, including highly enjoyable series such as <em>Hustle, Leverage,</em> and <em>The Mentalist,</em> and is undoubtedly a topic of relevance in this time which the public perceives as unusually rife with political and economic corruption (though in fact it's really all pretty much as usual with the human race).<br /></p><p>As with <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2007/04/hustle_season_4_ep_1.html" target="_blank"><em>Hustle</em></a> and <em>The Mentalist,</em> <em>White Collar</em> is rather extravagantly forgiving of the unsavory elements of Neal's past--he was a liar and a thief, after all--but without denying the moral import of his actions. It posits instead a redemptive point of view that acknowledges the superiority of repentance and reconciliation over simple punishment, while recognizing that many (if not most) people of a criminal bent are not interested in reform.<br /></p><p>Those thoughts are all under the surface, however, not stated openly, though anyone with normal acuity and a moral sense will surely see them. That, too, is how series television works best.<br /></p><p>Another appealing and rather unusual element of <em>White Collar</em> is a happy marriage at the center of the show. Burke is married to Elizabeth (Tiffani Thiessen), an attractive, smart, perceptive and understanding woman. This latter quality is important because Burke's work often puts strains on the amount of time he can spend with her, and he has in the past been all too inclined to take her for granted.</p><p>Here too, Caffrey does some good work, educating Burke about the importance of treating his wife well. This is made particularly poignant by another central story element of the show: while working for the FBI, Caffrey is surreptitiously pursuing the solution to a mystery of his own, the disappearance and probable abduction of his girlfriend. While recycling and slightly varying the central plot elements of <em>Monk,</em> <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2008/12/tnts_leverage.html" target="_blank"><em>Leverage</em></a>, and several other such series, the abduction scenario gives the viewer a strong sense that Caffrey has paid a high price for his prior crimes and is now acutely aware of their cost to others, and is thus a good candidate for forgiveness and redemption (as appears to be true also of <em>The Mentalist</em>, although it's not clear that much of what Patrick Jane did was actually criminal).</p><p>The supporting cast is quite talented, including Diahann Carroll, Willie Garson, Natalie Morales, and James Rebhorn. It's particularly good to see Carroll back on TV, and Rebhorn is always a strong screen presence. </p><p>Also enjoyable is the show's measured but definite appreciation for the finer things in life--good food, good clothes, nice cars, attractive people, comfortable and elegant home furnishings, and other such creature comforts. Caffrey's role in the cases, which typically consists of undercover work (as in <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/10/post_289.html" target="_blank"><em>NCIS: Los Angeles</em></a> but among a much more monied group of people) involves him rubbing elbows with beautiful and wealthy people and going to expensive restaurants and trendy nightclubs.<br /></p><p>While being intrinsically pleasing--nice things are pleasant to look at, after all--this aspect of the show also means something. In the perpetually puritanism-suffused United States, it's sometimes important to be reminded that the natural world is not intrinsically evil and that it's all right to enjoy life as long as one does not harm others or ignore the plight of the less-fortunate in doing so.</p><p>The modern-day Luddites who would send us all back to the eighteenth century (or the fifth, or prehistoric times) in a quest for environmental purity are only the most recent manifestation of this Manichean attitude, and <em>White Collar</em> is appealingly free of that impulse--and quite enjoyable for it.<br /></p><p>As noted earlier, however, the theme of personal redemption is at the forefront of the show. Central to that theme in plot terms is the issue of whether Burke can really trust Caffrey, whether the latter has truly turned his back on his old ways. Episode 3, &quot;Book of Hours,&quot; is especially attentive to this issue. As Burke and Elizabeth discuss the agent's concerns about having to trust Caffrey, she says, &quot;Sometimes you just have to take a leap of faith,&quot;</p><p>The episode explores the concept of faith in a much deeper way as well. A pre-Renaissance Bible with alleged healing powers has been stolen from a Catholic church, and Caffrey and Burke are assigned to find and retrieve it. The two discuss the possibility of whether miracles really can happen, with Burke, a lapsed Catholic, arguing against the possibility, and the stylish, free-spirited Caffrey&nbsp; arguing for it.</p><p>That's a refreshing reversal of the roles Hollywood usually assigns in discussions of religious faith, of course; typically the religious person has been shown as dour and unhappy and the doubter as much more likable.<br /></p><p>In the end of &quot;Book of Hours,&quot; the Bible literally saves Caffrey's life. Burke jokingly says, &quot;I guess the Big Guy had your back.&quot; Moments later, the book saves the life of a dying dog, and Caffrey tells the still-skeptical Burke, &quot;I'll take my miracles where I can get them,&quot; and, &quot;He [God] works in mysterious ways.&quot; Here, too, <em>White Collar</em> reflects the much-greater openness to religion shown in other recent series such as <em><a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2008/02/monk_and_god.html" target="_blank">Monk</a>, Psych, <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2008/12/post_207.html" target="_blank">Leverage</a>, <a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2006/10/csi_gets_religion_bigtime.html" target="_blank">CSI: Crime Scene Investigation</a>, The Mentalist,</em> and numerous others, a much more liberal and fair-minded attitude than Hollywood showed for many years before the current decade.<br /></p><p>With such classical liberal, generous, and morally sound attitudes, sharp writing, appealing performances, a surprisingly fresh visual presentation of New York City, a serious interest in the moral content of its characters' choices, and a strong sense that people are happiest when they're doing good things together, <em>White Collar</em> is the very model of a modern TV drama series.</p><p>Those who value surface originality above all other considerations will probably find it to be far beneath their dignity--but those who appreciate the good things formula fiction can do (<a href="http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/penny-dreadfuls.html" target="_blank">as the brilliant critic, belle-lettrist, and fiction writer G. K. Chesterton repeatedly stressed</a>) may find <em>White Collar</em> very much to their liking.</p><p><strong><em>--S. T. Karnick</em></strong><br /></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Fiction Friday</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/fiction_friday_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1445" title="Fiction Friday" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1445</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-04T17:56:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-04T19:21:01Z</updated>
    
    <summary>This week&apos;s issue of The Culture Alliance&apos;s Fiction Friday newsletter includes John J. Miller on Ronald Reagan&apos;s favorite novelist, C.S. Lewis on the attention critics give to Story as such, and an excerpt from a powerful short story on love...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel Crandall</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Prose fiction" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong><img width="400" vspace="10" hspace="10" height="293" border="0" align="left" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2723/4157723815_0b83008c78.jpg" />This week's issue of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theculturealliance.org/">The Culture Alliance's</a> <em>Fiction Friday</em> newsletter includes John J. Miller on Ronald Reagan's favorite novelist, C.S. Lewis on the attention critics give to Story as such, and an excerpt from a powerful short story on love and loss from aspiring YA author Kelly C. Roell. You can sign up for TCA's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theculturealliance.org/membership-sign-up?wstepNo=2&amp;wctxId=0e38da8b563d4e1f869734607304ad3d"><em>Fiction Friday</em> newsletter here</a>.<br /></strong>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Conservatives are huge consumers of nonfiction, and plenty of pundits and politicians respond accordingly. Ronald Reagan's favorite author, however, was a novelist, and had as great an affect on his thinking as the likes Hayek, Buckley and Chambers. John J. Miller examines Louis L'Amour, the author Reagan &quot;went out of his way to celebrate.&quot;<br /></p><blockquote>The bookshelves [at the Reagan Ranch - the so-called Western White House near Santa Barabara, CA] hold 247 volumes by the likes of William F. Buckley Jr. and Whittaker Chambers. Almost all are the actual copies that Reagan read. Yet five titles by western novelist Louis L&rsquo;Amour are duplicates. The originals remain at the Reagan home in Bel Air.<br /><br />&ldquo;Because Louis L&rsquo;Amour was my husband&rsquo;s favorite author, I decided to keep his books at the house with me instead of returning them to the Ranch,&rdquo; says Nancy Reagan. Four of the books are fiction: <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553275186?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0553275186">The Lonesome Gods</a></em>, <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553280406?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0553280406">The Walking Drum</a></em>, <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553280422?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0553280422">Last of the Breed</a></em>, and <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553270222?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0553270222">The Haunted Mesa</a></em>. One is a memoir: <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0553286528?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0553286528">Education of a Wandering Man</a></em>. In addition, there&rsquo;s a complete set of hardcover L&rsquo;Amour novels behind the president&rsquo;s desk in the private quarters of the Reagan Library in Simi Valley. ...<br /><br />Many conservatives have a pronounced tendency toward eggheadedness. Portraits of figures such as Friedrich Hayek and Russell Kirk line the hallways of the Heritage Foundation, not images of bestselling novelists. To be sure, Reagan was broadly familiar with right-of-center intellectuals. His appreciation of L&rsquo;Amour, however, may reveal something important about his success as a politician &mdash; and hold lessons for conservatives who would like to see it repeated. ...<br /><br />For many of Reagan&rsquo;s liberal adversaries, the president&rsquo;s fondness for L&rsquo;Amour&rsquo;s books confirmed their cherished picture of him as a cowboy-loving simpleton. Sometimes conservatives piled on. &ldquo;By all means, read westerns, Mr. President, but why Louis L&rsquo;Amour?&rdquo; wrote George Will. &ldquo;He is a pale writer.&rdquo; ...<br /><br />Will was punning on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6304698682?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=6304698682"><em>Pale Rider</em></a>, a western movie starring Clint Eastwood that had come out around the time Reagan was turning the pages of Jubal Sackett. Maybe the columnist had sampled one of L&rsquo;Amour&rsquo;s lesser works. Whatever the case, pale writers sometimes obtain faddish commercial success. They rarely secure a lasting place in the culture. L&rsquo;Amour&rsquo;s ongoing popularity is perhaps best understood as an expression of American folk wisdom, and the abiding appeal of the author&rsquo;s standard themes of patriotism, freedom, moral uprightness, and hard work.<br /><br />Reagan achieved his own success because he sounded similar notes in the arena of politics. L&rsquo;Amour, in fact, was a registered Democrat. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re not Republicans,&rdquo; says his widow, Kathy. &ldquo;But we did vote for Ronald Reagan twice. I guess we&rsquo;re Reagan Democrats. We always felt he was so good for the country.&rdquo; Reagan believed L&rsquo;Amour was good for the country. When the author died in 1988 &mdash; of lung cancer, even though he wasn&rsquo;t a smoker &mdash; Reagan recorded the news in his personal diary. Two days later, he called Kathy to offer his condolences.</blockquote><p>Every author, including literary celebrities such as Louis L'Amour, began as an aspiring writer. This week's excerpt is from a short story by aspiring YA author Kelly C. Roell. She is seeking representation and, until she finds it, pays the bills as a test prep writer for About.com, a NY Times company. &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://lunchreads.blogspot.com/2009/11/dust-to-dust-young-adult.html">Dust to Dust</a>&quot; appeared at Libby Malin's <a target="_blank" href="http://lunchreads.blogspot.com/"><em>&quot;Lunch Reads&quot; blog</em></a>. </p><blockquote>The funeral was just stretching on and on that hot Sunday in the middle of the summer. I took a look at my long bony fingers, sweaty and clammy from the 90-degree weather, and ached to be splashing around in the creek behind the church. Daddy promised that the rain from Friday would cool everything down, but the sun just sucked up all the water the same as it did every year. All the women, dressed in black with funny-looking hats, whispered at each other and blew their noses into hankies as they fanned themselves cooler. Pastor Tom preached on and on in his booming voice like it was just another boring Sunday and no one had even died. Miss Patterson, my favorite Sunday school teacher, whispered &lsquo;cross the aisle to Daddy that &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a cryin&rsquo; shame, ya know.&rdquo; Daddy shrugged his big old coal-mining shoulders and said, &ldquo;The good Lord knows what&rsquo;s best.&rdquo; I knew he wasn&rsquo;t really sad because he was a &ldquo;hard-hearted man with no sense and no decency,&rdquo; like Momma used to say when he&rsquo;d come home smelling like whiskey.<br /><br />At the end of the sermon, which lasted around five days to all us pew-squirming kids, I finally got to get up and stretch my scrawny legs. &ldquo;Chicken legs,&rdquo; like Momma said. I spread my arms out to the side and yawned so wide my insides felt clean with the new air, muggy as it was. Daddy pushed me up to the front with a &ldquo;Git movin&rsquo;, Katie&rdquo; and I sulked out of the yawn and made my way up to the casket. My silly frilly dress, made by Momma&rsquo;s loving hands, scratched and bothered me into a tither as I stood by the coffin and pretended to like everyone hugging and squeezing me. I hated frills and foo-foo dresses, and hated sweaty people touching me just the same. I thought that just because someone died, I shouldn't have to be scratched to death by the dress and hugged like it was my own self that was dying.<br /><br />Although really, I wouldn&rsquo;t have minded.<br /><br />At least then I&rsquo;d get to see Momma again. ...<br /></blockquote><p>Continue reading &quot;Dust to Dust&quot; <a target="_blank" href="http://lunchreads.blogspot.com/2009/11/dust-to-dust-young-adult.html">here</a>. </p><p>Finally, whether a work is classified as Western, Young Adult, Science Fiction or Thriller, what really attracts readers are the stories writers tell. C.S. Lewis notes, in his essay &quot;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0156027682?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=karnickoncult-20&amp;linkCode=xm2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creativeASIN=0156027682">On Stories</a>&quot;, it is the quality of Story to which most critics pay the least attention. <br /></p><blockquote>It is astonishing how little attention critics have paid to Story considered in itself. Granted the story, the style in which it should be told, the order in which it should be disposed, and (above all) the delineation of the characters, have been abundantly discussed. But the Story itself, the series of imagined events, is nearly always passed over in silence, or else treated exclusively as affording opportunities for the delineation of character. There are indeed three notable exceptions. Aristotle in the Poetics constructed a theory of Greek tragedy which puts Story in the centre and relegates character to a strictly subordinate place. In the Middle Ages and the early renaissance, Boccaccio and others developed an allegorical theory of Story to explain the ancient myths. And in our own time Jung and his followers have produced their doctrine of Archetypes. Apart from these three attempts the subject has been left almost untouched, and this has had a curious result. Those forms of literature in which Story exists merely as a means to something else &ndash; for example, the novel of manners where the story is there for the sake of the characters, or the criticism of social conditions &ndash; have had full justice done to them; but those forms in which everything else is there for the sake of the story have been given little serious attention. Not only have they been despised, as if they were fit only for children, but even the kind of pleasure they give has, in my opinion, been misunderstood. It is the second injustice which I am most anxious to remedy. Perhaps the pleasure of Story comes as low in the scale as modern criticism puts it. I do not think so myself, but on that point we may agree to differ. Let us, however, try to see clearly what kind of pleasure it is: or rather, what different kinds of pleasure it may be. For I suspect that a very hasty assumption has been made on this subject. I think that books which are read merely &lsquo;for the story&rsquo; may be enjoyed in two very different ways. It is partly a division of books (some stories can be read only in the one spirit and some only in the other) and partly a division of readers (the same story can be read in different ways).<br /></blockquote><p> </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&apos;Monk&apos; Finale Tonight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/monk_finale_tonight.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1444" title="'Monk' Finale Tonight" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1444</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-04T16:53:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-04T18:17:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Monk, final episode, bourgeois, values</summary>
    <author>
        <name>S. T. Karnick</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Mysteries" />
            <category term="Television" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong><img width="300" hspace="10" height="206" border="0" align="right" title="Image from 'Monk'" alt="Image from 'Monk'" src="http://static.tvguide.com/MediaBin/Content/081110/News/Todays_News_Our_Take/5_fri/081114monk1.jpg" /></strong></p><p align="center">&nbsp;</p><p align="center">&nbsp;</p><p align="center"><strong>After eight years, USA Network's <em>Monk</em> concludes tonight with the second half of a two-part episode tying all the loose ends together--and introducing some new ones, S. T. Karnick writes.</strong><br /></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Monk</em> has been one of the best fiction series on U.S. television during the current decade, and tonight's concluding episode (9 p.m. EST, USA Network) promises to tie up the few remaining vagrant plot strands. The <a target="_blank" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/11/monk_enters_last_three_weeks.html">show's producers have done a good job of bringing to conclusions the various characters' stories</a>, resolving the major problems each has faced during the eight years of the show's run. That process has meshed well with the central interest of this type of mystery fiction: the restoration of bourgeois order after a major disruption caused by crime.</p><p>Thus in recent episodes Capt. Leland Stottlemeyer has gotten married again, something he longed for, and Sharona has returned to apologize to Monk for her abrupt departure several years earlier and reconciled with him. Widow and Monk assistant Natalie Teeger has found a potential husband as well, a Navy officer of very good character who clearly loves her. This will be quite a comfort to her as Natalie's daughter, Julie, is moving on to college.<br /></p><p>Similarly, Monk was given back his detective badge and reinstated to the SF police force--and then realized that it wasn't what he really wanted and that life as a consultant was a better way for a man of his talents. In addition, Monk's symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder have receded a little as he has begun to resolve some of the psychological problems behind his compulsions. In fact, Monk has finally started to realize how much of his life he has wasted because of his compulsions and has begun to understand what he really wants out of life.</p><p>And in last week's episode, Monk finally opened Trudy's Christmas gift to him of a dozen years earlier--and found that it was not what he had expected. <br /></p><p>Only a couple of elements remain to be resolved. One, what Lt. Randy Disher will do with his life, has been hinted at in recent weeks and will probably be concluded tonight. And two, of course, the person responsible for killing Monk's wife will probably be brought to justice and his motives revealed.</p><p>In last week's episode, the person behind the killing was identified for the audience, and as Monk homed in on the solution to this central mystery of the series, the great detective was poisoned by some mysterious method and declined quickly toward death. (It's fairly obvious how the poisoning was done, however, and one can feel confident that Monk or one of those close to him will figure it out just in time to save his life.)</p><p>All of this has constituted a satisfying and thoroughly appropriate conclusion to a series that always stood for sound values and did so with a winsome attitude.<br /></p><p>Some in the press have also revealed that there will be an additional twist in tonight's concluding episode (which I won't identify), which will give Monk something new over which to obsess. This suggests that the door is being left open for the story to continue on TV in the form of made-for-TV movies or, less likely, a resumption of the series in the future (or perhaps even in theatrical films, though that's unlikely with the show's audience demographics).</p><p>That will be good news for those who like the show and have not been satisfied with the Monk novels by Lee Goldberg, even if it's not great news for Monk. But as a modern-day detective, he has to go through a good deal of misery in order to do his job (a convention that I would very much like to see retired). And in the end, it's clear that Monk takes great satisfaction in the good work that he does.</p><p>That's something most people seek, and it's what has always been at the heart of the show: finding true happiness in doing good for others.<br /></p><p><strong><em>--S. T. Karnick</em></strong><br /></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Dwight Schrute Sings &apos;We Are The World&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/dwight_schrute_sings_we_are_th_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1443" title="Dwight Schrute Sings 'We Are The World'" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1443</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-04T07:31:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-04T07:49:09Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;Fact: At 4:07, 4:19 and 5:55 (close-up) of the following video, Dwight Schrute from &quot;The Office&quot; is standing next to Harry Belafonte during Quincy Jones' iconic &quot;We Are the World&quot; Super Group benefit video....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Lakely</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Television" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align: center"><img width="450" height="311" border="0" title="Dwight Schrute" alt="Dwight Schrute" src="http://blog.submityourquote.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/rainn-wilson-as-dwight-schrute.jpg" /></div><p>&nbsp;</p><h3 align="center"><strong>Fact: At 4:07, 4:19 and 5:55 (close-up) of the following video, <br>Dwight Schrute from &quot;The Office&quot; is standing next to Harry Belafonte during<br> Quincy Jones' iconic &quot;We Are the World&quot; Super Group benefit video. </strong><br /></h3>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;Don't worry. I've confirmed this. I emailed Dwight myself. And he related the following information, quoted directly ...<br /><br /><blockquote>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: Harry Belefonte smells funny after a night of partying.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: That's not Cyndi Lauper's real hair color.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: I was not the only one wondering why Huey Lewis was there. Willie Nelson gave me a knowing glance.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: Dionne Warwick tried to give me a Psychic Friends reading.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: Huey Lewis didn't know who James Ingram was, either. Huey's off the hook.<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: Bruce Springsteen was just a little too into his singing part. (Editor's Note: Dwight Shrute says he is convinced that Bruce was the most-sober performer &mdash; and since Dwight Schrute was fully sober, Dwight Shrute could definitely have taken him that night in a battle of martial arts.)<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fact: Kim Carnes paid money to be included. Money wasted.<br /><br />Dwight Schrute started to ramble after that. Something about how he thinks Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder are faking their 'blindness' to bump up record sales. "Everyone knows people open their wallets for the 'handicapped',"; he said. Anyway, I present the evidence:</p><p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmxT21uFRwM&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmxT21uFRwM&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The Washington Times to Slash 40 Percent of its Staff</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/the_washington_times_to_slash.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1442" title="The Washington Times to Slash 40 Percent of its Staff" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1442</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-03T21:53:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-03T22:07:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;My former employer, The Washington Times, has announced a 40 percent staff reduction &mdash; and just in time for Christmas! &nbsp;The paper, which in the very near future will be distributed for free in the DC-area, will reportedly only concentrate...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Lakely</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Journalism" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img width="336" vspace="20" hspace="20" height="612" border="0" align="left" src="http://blog.case.edu/conservativemovement/2006/06/09/Washington%20times.jpg" alt="Washington Times Out of Business" title="Washington Times Out of Business" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><strong>My former employer, <em>The Washington Times</em>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR2009120203295.html?sub=AR">has announced a 40 percent staff reduction</a> &mdash; and just in time for Christmas! </strong></h3><h3>&nbsp;</h3><h3><strong>The paper, which in the very near future will be distributed for free in the DC-area, will reportedly only concentrate on national political coverage &mdash;&nbsp;meaning, it seems, the end of the Metro, Sports, Style and Business sections ... for starters.</strong></h3>]]>
        <![CDATA[ <p>This news makes me glad I'm a <em>former</em> employee. But this is a sad day. I still have many friends at that paper, which even <em>The Washington Post's</em> Howie Kurtz admitted often &quot;punched above its weight class.&quot; Indeed. We were out-staffed and out-resourced by at least a factor of 5 (if not 10) by our rivals, but rattled <em>The Post</em> and <em>The New York Times</em> &mdash; often making them follow our coverage.</p> <p>I will forever be grateful for the opportunity <em>The Washington Times</em> gave me to practice newspapering at the highest levels and beats &mdash; Congress and The White House. I subscribed to the paper's weekly &quot;digest&quot; version (it arrived in the mail) when I lived in Pennsylvania, and dreamed of working for it one day. That dream came to pass ... Darn it!&nbsp; I don't want this post to be the beginning of a eulogy ... but it sure feels like it.</p> <p><strong>A friend there emails his lack of immense worry:</strong> &quot;The cuts will all be people we never heard of, upstairs.&quot;</p> <p><strong>Another (very veteran reporter) is more nervous, emailing:</strong> &quot;I'm not sure what the future holds and whether I'm in or out. Problem is, I don't think the managers know yet either who to keep and who to send packing. I can't imagine the product they envision, but there are few places to go if I don't like it.&quot;</p><p>That's not necessarily true. The traditional newspaper business we've all grown up with has been undergoing a painful transition, with the troubles at <em>The Washington Times</em> merely the latest example. Even though I love newspapers, I haven't had one tossed onto my driveway in years, and likely never will again &mdash; nostalgia be dammed.<br /></p><p>But there will always be a need for the services of journalists. They'll just be on the Web. And my veteran reporter friend would hardly have trouble finding a new employer, if it came to that.</p><p>(<a href="http://blog.infinitemonkeysblog.com/?q=node/6887" target="_blank"><em>Cross-posted at Infinite Monkeys</em></a>) <br /></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>About the Comcast-NBC/Universal Merger</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/about_the_comcastnbcuniversal.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1441" title="About the Comcast-NBC/Universal Merger" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1441</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-03T20:26:19Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-03T20:42:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The long-awaited announcement of a deal between cable giant Comcast and NBC/Universal came down this morning. In short, Comcast will now be the majority owner of NBC &mdash; long the property of General Electric.&nbsp;My first concern? Whither the great jokes...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Lakely</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Commerce" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img width="400" vspace="15" hspace="15" height="400" border="0" align="left" src="http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/071220/alec_l.jpg" alt="Jack Donaghy 30 Rock" title="Jack Donaghy 30 Rock" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h3><strong>The long-awaited <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/04/business/media/04nbc.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">announcement of a deal between</a> cable giant Comcast and NBC/Universal came down this morning. In short, Comcast will now be the majority owner of NBC &mdash; long the property of General Electric.</strong></h3><h3><strong>&nbsp;</strong></h3><h3><strong>My first concern? Whither the great jokes and story line on NBC's &quot;30 Rock&quot; involving Alec Baldwin's Jack Donaghy?</strong><br /></h3>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>That's a big concern. I'm sure the great writers for &quot;30 Rock&quot; will figure something out &mdash; I expect a whole episode dedicated to it, if not running jokes for weeks &mdash; but Jack conniving &quot;ingenious&quot; schemes to cross-promote the products of the Mother Company will just not have the same <em>cache</em> ... no offense, Comcast.</p><p>Anyway, in my capacity as the co-director of the Center on the Digital Economy for <a href="http://www.heartland.org/" target="_blank">The Heartland Institute</a>, I issued <a href="http://www.heartland.org/infotech-news.org/article/26478/Heartland_Institute_Analyst_Weighs_In_on_ComcastNBCUniversal_Deal.html" target="_blank">the following statement on the deal today</a>. The intent is to counter the already rising cries that this transaction will somehow harm consumers. Don't believe it:</p><blockquote><p>&quot;The usual suspects are saying this merger will harm consumers and put too much power in the hands of large corporate forces--and they're just as wrong as they've been every other time they sounded the trumpet of panic.</p><p>&quot;Many alarmists said the deal that combined forces between AOL and Time Warner in 2000 would create a media colossus that would crush competition and rub out the vital line between content provider and distributor. A few years later, after bleeding tens of billions of dollars, the companies split apart when the combined operation couldn't compete.</p><p>&quot;The deal that merged Sirius and XM was characterized as dangerous because it would create a monopoly in satellite radio. Instead, it staved off bankruptcy and the complete collapse of that technology as a viable commercial enterprise--at least for now.</p><p>&quot;Comcast may indeed establish a business plan in which NBC/Universal content gets priority on its network from consumers who prefer to watch TV on their computers. The proper response should be: So what? Such an arrangement is more likely to hurt Comcast's bottom line than help it, because consumers quickly punish those who establish 'walled gardens' on the Web.</p><p>&quot;History proves consumers are the most accurate and powerful regulators of the new media landscape. Government should get out of the way of this merger and revisit the new company on a case-by-case basis in the future to address actual, not theoretical, harms.&quot;</p></blockquote>        <p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>TCM Thrillers Preview (December 7 - 13)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/tcm_thrillers_preview_december.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1440" title="TCM Thrillers Preview (December 7 - 13)" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1440</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-03T16:19:10Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-03T17:20:13Z</updated>
    
    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Gray</name>
        <uri>http://stkarnick.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Movies" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img width="210" height="300" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/af/Thebigheatmp.JPG" border="0" hspace="10" /></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center"><img width="324" height="487" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5a/Arsenic_And_Old_Lace_Poster.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51GX0TPZH5L._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="332" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/warner/northbynorthwest/Warner_NXNW19-800.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="364" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/warner/northbynorthwest/Warner_NXNW02-800.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="354" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/warner/northbynorthwest/Warner_NXNW10-800.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="329" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/warner/northbynorthwest/Warner_NXNW12-800.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="349" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/warner/northbynorthwest/Warner_NXNW11-800.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="359" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/warner/northbynorthwest/Warner_NXNW15-800.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="282" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/416Y9SlIaFL.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="282" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41tdrvrCj2L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="494" height="755" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3a/Family_plot_movie_poster.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Tuesday" alt="Tuesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AJ981SQHL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41umldXx7tL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="300" height="400" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/image/thirdman/ThirdMan_1_L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="300" height="400" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/image/thirdman/ThirdMan_2_L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="300" height="400" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/image/thirdman/ThirdMan_3_L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="331" height="560" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d9/DeadOfNight1.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61l3KXfCosL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51D36ARQ06L._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="450" height="450" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Crimeschool.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51bZ5l02%2B4L._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/510XQ5FD26L._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Wednesday" alt="Wednesday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51B7DF9DFCL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5129D0A3BZL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="397" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/d3/a0/90b2c060ada04886f0440210.L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="379" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/f7/e5/9cdcc060ada05886f0440210.L.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="491" height="755" title="Thursday" alt="Thursday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8c/Fitzwilly_1967.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="440" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/TheBribeLobby.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51N1SF0G3ZL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="288" height="436" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e8/DOA1950.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="367" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Laurette_Luez_and_Edmond_O%27Brien_in_DOA.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="283" height="435" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/15/Hitch-Hiker_poster.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="500" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AMFSJWhcL._SS500_.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="356" height="263" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/89/Hitch-Hiker_Lupino.jpg" border="0" hspace="10" /></div><div style="text-align: center"><img width="500" height="413" title="Friday" alt="Friday" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/06/Hitchhiker.JPG" border="0" hspace="10" /></div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Update on Minnesota PC Teacher Training Curriculum</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/12/update_on_minnesota_pc_teacher.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stkarnick.com/blog-mt2/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=1439" title="Update on Minnesota PC Teacher Training Curriculum" />
    <id>tag:stkarnick.com,2009://1.1439</id>
    
    <published>2009-12-02T16:46:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-02T16:55:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[A previous post, &ldquo;Mind-Boggling Mind Control in Minnesota&rdquo; revealed just how far academic anti-American ideologues will go in pushing their agenda down the throats of the American people....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mike D&apos;Virgilio</name>
        <uri>stkarnick</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stkarnick.com/">
        <![CDATA[<strong>A previous post, </strong><a href="http://stkarnick.com/blog2/2009/11/post_310.html" target="_blank"><strong>&ldquo;Mind-Boggling Mind Control in Minnesota&rdquo;</strong></a><strong> revealed just how far academic anti-American ideologues will go in pushing their agenda down the throats of the American people.</strong>]]>
        <![CDATA[With 50 million children enrolled in K-12 education in America the stakes are exceedingly high about who is teaching and what is taught to our nation's children. Minding the Campus has a piece, <a href="http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2009/11/by_kc_johnson_thanks_to.html" target="_blank">&ldquo;Decoding Teacher Training,&rdquo;</a> that reports a small positive step in what some organizations are doing to fight against this disease in academia. <br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

